Solar Leases vs PPAs What's the Difference and Which is Better?

The decision to choose solar power requires evaluating several financing options, which sometimes feel complex. The two preferred solar financing solutions are solar leases together with power purchase agreements (PPAs). The solar financing options appear similarly structured because both methods provide solar power without initial payments. The agreements have essential distinctions in their actual conditions, regardless of sharing initial similarities.

Get A Free Solar Quote

So, what’s the best option for your home? Let’s break down solar PPA vs lease to help you make the right call for your energy needs, budget, and long-term savings.

Free Solar? Not Exactly…

Solar panel advertisements often assert that owners can receive them for zero cost. Solar leases, together with PPAs, eliminate installation expenses but do not provide completely free service. You defer the payment for your generated energy through alternative methods, though you continue to pay for its use.
Understanding how solar PPA vs lease works can help you avoid hidden fees and maximize your return on solar investment. Let’s dive into each option.

What Is a Solar Lease?

With a solar lease, you pay a fixed monthly fee to "rent" a solar system that a provider installs on your roof. The company owns and maintains the equipment, while you benefit from the energy it produces.

Pros:

$0 upfront cost
Fixed monthly payment
Maintenance included

Cons:

No tax incentives for you (they go to the provider)
20–25-year contracts
May complicate home resale

This option offers predictability. You know exactly what you'll pay each month regardless of how much electricity the system produces.

What Is a Solar PPA?

The Power Purchase Agreement (PPA) functions differently from the other options. With a PPA arrangement, you receive a variable invoicing system that matches your solar panel electricity output.

The solar energy payment system works similarly to cellular phone plans because you would pay only for the electricity you produce.

Pros:

$0 upfront cost
You only pay for what you use
Often lower rate than utility prices

Cons:

Less predictable bills
No ownership or tax credits
Long-term agreements (20–25 years)

In the solar PPA vs lease debate, PPAs give you flexibility, especially if you’re aiming to save more during sunny months when production is high.

Ownership: Who Owns the Panels?

Neither a lease nor a PPA gives you ownership of the solar system. The solar company installs and maintains the equipment, and they retain all federal tax credits, state incentives, and depreciation benefits.

If you want to own your solar panels and claim incentives yourself, a loan or cash purchase would be better. But if your goal is to go solar with zero upfront investment, solar PPA vs lease becomes the key comparison.

Which Saves More Money?

Savings vary based on your location, the solar provider, and how much electricity your home uses.

In general:

Solar leases give you consistent monthly costs, which is great if you like budgeting.
PPAs can offer bigger savings in sunny areas where your panels will produce more electricity year-round.

However, some PPAs include price escalators—clauses that raise your rate slightly each year. If you’re comparing solar PPA vs lease, always check for escalators in the contract.

What Happens If You Sell Your Home?

One of the biggest factors in the solar PPA vs lease discussion is home resale.
In either case, the contract must be transferred to the new homeowner or bought out before closing. If the buyer isn’t on board, it can complicate or even kill the deal.

To avoid surprises:

Choose providers with strong transfer support
Include contract details in your home listing
Work with a real estate agent familiar with solar

Home buyers today are generally more open to solar, especially when it’s saving them money. But transparency is key.

Maintenance and Monitoring

Both solar leases and PPAs usually include:

System monitoring
Routine maintenance
Repairs (if something breaks)

That’s a big advantage over owning, where you're responsible for upkeep. With third-party ownership, you get peace of mind knowing the provider is watching over system performance.

Another point in the solar PPA vs lease showdown: if you're hands-off, both options win here.

Federal and State Incentives

Since you don’t own the panels in either arrangement, you miss out on:

The 30% federal solar tax credit
State-level rebates
Accelerated depreciation (for businesses)

These perks go to the solar company. That’s how they make it profitable for them to install systems with no upfront charge to you.

If these incentives are important to you, a loan or cash purchase may be more suitable than navigating the solar PPA vs lease route.

Contract Terms and Flexibility

Most leases and PPAs last 20 to 25 years. Early termination can trigger hefty fees. But some providers offer buyout options midway through the term, giving you a chance to purchase the system outright at a depreciated value.
Always read the fine print before signing. Understand:

What your escalation rate is (if any)
What happens at contract end
If you have early buyout options

Being informed is crucial in comparing solar PPA vs lease deals.

So—Which One Is Better?
The better choice depends on your priorities:

If you want predictable monthly payments → Go with a solar lease
If you want to potentially save more over time, → Choose a PPA
If you value simplicity and hands-off maintenance, → both are solid
If ownership and tax benefits matter → Explore loans or purchases instead

In the end, both PPAs and leases make solar more accessible. Just be sure to compare multiple providers, check for escalation clauses, and calculate long-term savings.